Abstract
Objective
Pubertal gynecomastia is associated with psychosocial consequences including anxiety, depression, and body image disturbances. However systematic examination of bullying experiences and their psychological correlates in adolescents with gynecomastia remains limited. The aim of this study was to investigate peer victimization prevalence and its relationship with psychological outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Methods
This case-control study included male adolescents aged 10-17 years, comprising half with gynecomastia and half healthy controls. Gynecomastia diagnosis and severity were assessed using clinical examination and Rohrich classification. Participants completed validated Turkish versions of the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Results
A total of 155 adolescents were included, with 78 (50.3%) having gynecomastia and the remaining 77 being healthy. Adolescents with gynecomastia demonstrated significantly higher peer victimization rates compared to controls (34.6% versus 16.9%, p=0.012), with markedly increased victim-perpetrator status (12.8% versus 1.3%, p=0.005). Gynecomastia diagnosis increased victimization risk 2.63-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.076-6.436, p=0.034). Victimized participants exhibited elevated anxiety and depression scores across multiple symptom domains (p<0.05). Behavioral modifications were prevalent, including altered clothing preferences (58.9%), changing room avoidance (44.8%), and swimming avoidance (41.0%).
Conclusion
Adolescents with gynecomastia experienced substantially elevated peer victimization with consequential psychological impact in this cohort. These findings suggest the importance of routine bullying assessment during clinical evaluation and implementation of comprehensive psychosocial screening protocols with early intervention strategies.
Keywords: Pubertal gynecomastia, peer victimization, bullying, adolescents, anxiety, depression
Read the full text
5 sections · 5 tables · PDF
Create your free account to read the full text.
- Full text with figures and tables
- PDF and supplementary files
- Access on every Galenos journal
One Galenos account works on every Galenos journal site.
References
Berger O, Hornik-Lurie T, Talisman R. Pubertal gynecomastia incidence among 530,000 boys: a cross sectional population based study. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1367550.
Metwalley KA, Farghaly HS. Gynecomastia in adolescent males: current understanding of its etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2024;29:75-81.
Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM, Adams WP Jr. Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:909-923.
Ma NS, Geffner ME. Gynecomastia in prepubertal and pubertal men. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20:465-470.
Berger O, Landau Z, Talisman R. Gynecomastia: A systematic review of pharmacological treatments. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:978311.
Lemaine V, Cayci C, Simmons PS, Petty P. Gynecomastia in adolescent males. Semin Plast Surg. 2013;27:56-61.
Nuzzi LC, Cerrato FE, Erikson CR, Webb ML, Rosen H, Walsh EM, DiVasta AD, Greene AK, Labow BI. Psychosocial impact of adolescent gynecomastia: a prospective case-control study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:890-896.
Lashin R, Youssef RA, Elshahat A, Mohamed EN. Postoperative psychological impact on teenagers after gynecomastia correction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11:e5094.
Kinsella C Jr, Landfair A, Rottgers SA, Cray JJ, Weidman C, Deleyiannis FW, Grunwaldt L, Losee JE. The psychological burden of idiopathic adolescent gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1-7.
Nuzzi LC, Firriolo JM, Pike CM, Cerrato FE, DiVasta AD, Labow BI. The effect of surgical treatment for gynecomastia on quality of life in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63:759-765. Epub 2018 Sep 29
Rew L, Young C, Harrison T, Caridi R. A systematic review of literature on psychosocial aspects of gynecomastia in adolescents and young men. J Adolesc. 2015;43:206-212. Epub 2015 Jul 5
Karpinski M, Tuen YJ, Courtemanche R, Arneja JS. Quality of life measured using the BODY-Q after adolescent gynecomastia surgery: a cross-sectional analysis. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024;33:601-608.
Modecki KL, Minchin J, Harbaugh AG, Guerra NG, Runions KC. Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55:602-611. Epub 2014 Aug 25
Puhl RM, Lessard LM. Weight stigma in youth: prevalence, consequences, and considerations for clinical practice. Curr Obes Rep. 2020;9:402-411. Epub 2020 Oct 20
Low E, Monsen J, Schow L, Roberts R, Collins L, Johnson H, Hanson CL, Snell Q, Tass ES. Predicting bullying victimization among adolescents using the risk and protective factor framework: a large-scale machine learning approach. BMC Public Health. 2025;25:321.
Moore SE, Norman RE, Suetani S, Thomas HJ, Sly PD, Scott JG. Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Psychiatry. 2017;7:60-76.
Neyzi O, Bundak R, Gökçay G, Günöz H, Furman A, Darendeliler F, Baş F. Reference values for weight, height, head circumference, and body mass index in Turkish children. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2015;7:280-293.
Olweus D. Revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2025 July 30]; Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ft09634-000
Sipahi HT, Karababa AO. Adoption of Olweus bully victim questionnaire to Turkish and Turkey and analysis of its validity and reliability. Ege Journal of Medicine. 2018;57:222-227.
Rosenberg M. Rosenberg self-esteem scale. J Relig Health. 1965.
Çuhadaroğlu F. Adölesanlarda benlik saygısı. [Ankara]: Hacettepe University; 1986.
Chorpita BF, Moffitt CE, Gray J. Psychometric properties of the revised child anxiety and depression scale in a clinical sample. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43:309-322.
Gormez V, Kılınçaslan A, Orengul AC, Ebesutani C, Kaya I, Ceri V, Nasıroğlu S, Chorpita Bruce MF. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the revised child anxiety and depression scale - child version in a clinical sample. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2017;27:84-92.
Myers TA, Crowther JH. Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: a meta-analytic review. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118:683-698.
van Geel M, Vedder P, Tanilon J. Are overweight and obese youths more often bullied by their peers? A meta-analysis on the correlation between weight status and bullying. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014;37:1263-1267. Epub 2014 Jul 8
Webb HJ, Zimmer‐Gembeck MJ. The role of friends and peers in adolescent body dissatisfaction: a review and critique of 15 years of research. J Res Adolesc. 2014;24:564-590.
Anderson M, Faverio M, Gottfried J. Teens, social media and technology 2023. Pew Research Center. 2023.
Mercan Isik C, Ozturk M, Bestas A. Gynecomastia and adolescence: psychological effects of social appearance anxiety and peer bullying. J Pediatr Nurs. 2025;83:23-29. Epub 2025 Apr 24
Reijntjes A, Kamphuis JH, Prinzie P, Telch MJ. Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse Negl. 2010;34:244-252. Epub 2010 Mar 20
Cook CR, Williams KR, Guerra NG, Kim TE, Sadek S. Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly. 2010;25:65-83.
Ariani TA, Putri AR, Firdausi FA, Aini N. Global prevalence and psychological impact of bullying among children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2025;385:119446. Epub 2025 May 18
López-Castro L, Smith PK, Robinson S, Görzig A. Age differences in bullying victimisation and perpetration: evidence from cross-cultural surveys. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2023;73:101888.
Crerand CE, Magee L. Cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery in adolescents: psychological, ethical, and legal considerations. Semin Plast Surg. 2013;27:72-78.
Arslan SC, Esin IS, Cayır A, Orbak Z, Dursun OB. The relationship between psychopathology, self-esteem, body perception and serum sex steroids in pubertal gynecomastia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2021;19:498-506.
Meral Y, Sezgin M, Özer Y. Psychological resilience, body appreciation, and associations with anxiety and depression in pubertal gynecomastia: a case-controlled study. Neuropsychiatr Invest. 2025;63:1-9.
Kasielska A, Antoszewski B. Effect of operative treatment on psychosocial problems of men with gynaecomastia. Pol Przegl Chir. 2011;83:614-621.
